A beautician stating that a conditioner can fix badly damaged hair is an example of what?

The statement made by the beautician claiming that a conditioner can fix badly damaged hair constitutes an implied warranty. Implied warranties refer to unspoken or unwritten guarantees that arise from the nature of the transaction and the behavior of the parties involved. When a beautician makes a claim regarding a product's ability to repair hair damage, there is an inherent assumption that the conditioner is suitable for that purpose, based on the beautician's expertise and the expectations of the customer.

In this context, customers reasonably expect that products marketed for hair treatment will effectively deliver the results promised by the beautician. This expectation forms the basis of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, which indicates that the product will meet the needs that the buyer has communicated.

The other options, like express warranty, involve specific promises or guarantees made in written or spoken form. A contingent warranty would imply certain conditions must be met for the warranty to be valid, while a conditional warranty typically requires specific actions to be taken by the buyer or seller. In this scenario, the beautician's statement does not fit into those categories, reinforcing the notion that the statement reflects an implied warranty.